Accreditation Meditation: Lessons from the Field and Tips
Accreditation Meditation: Lessons from the Field and Tips for Success Janice Munroe, BScPharm Regional Pharmacy Medication Safety Coordinator, Fraser Health, BC Julie Greenall, BScPhm, MHSc, ACPR, FISMPC Director of Projects and Education, ISMP Canada Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists Professional Practice Conference Sunday, January 31, 2016 Toronto ON
Presenter Disclosure Presenters: Janice Munroe and Julie Greenall ISMP Canada has received limited unrestricted honoraria from various pharmaceutical companies for educational presentations
Janice receives an honourarium from Accreditation Canada for surveys conducted We have received no speaker fees for this learning activity Commercial Support Disclosure Janice has received support from CSHP to cover expenses associated with attending this conference to provide this presentation
Julies time to prepare and present today is supported through a grant from Health Canada through the Canadian Medication Incident Reporting and Prevention System Disclosure The opinions expressed are those of the speakers and may not reflect the views of Accreditation Canada. Please consult Accreditation Canada directly for any questions related to their Standards and Required Organizational Practices.
This presentation references Version 10 of the Accreditation Standards, applicable to organizations surveyed in 2016. Learning Objectives At the conclusion of this presentation, participants will: Understand key changes to the Medication Management Standards and Required Organizational Practices (ROPs) introduced in 2014; Understand the surveyor perspective on how the standards are assessed; Be aware of areas of ongoing challenge from a medication safety perspective; and
Be aware of tips and tools to support organizations in identifying potential areas of vulnerability and implementing improvements. Self Assessment Questions When is an interdisciplinary committee approved exception appropriate? How will changes to the Medication Reconciliation ROP for the Emergency program and peri-operative environment
affect my practice? Presentation Outline Background Management of exceptions
New expectations for medication reconciliation Case studies and discussion Tools and resources Background
Accreditation Canada Qmentum Managing Medications Standards Revised for surveys in January 2014 Medication Management Standards New format and flow Focus on responsibility of the organization for medication management (not just pharmacy) New, clearer ROPs Exceptions introduced
Surveyor Selection and Training Surveyors undergo an evaluation/screening before acceptance Qualifications Experience Real-time interview Accepted surveyors receive detailed training
Introduction to the accreditation process Different standards Ratings Software Surveyor Training and Commitment On site tracer Local hospital Hands on experience Receive feedback
Future surveys Minimum of 2 per year Maintain experience Change in frequency of organization surveys has made this challenging Competency All surveyors are required to successfully complete annual online education modules Varied topics
Governance Report writing Rating Select Standards Accreditation Canada coordinates a surveyor education conference every 3 years Survey Planning
Developed collaboratively Organizational quality leads Assigned Accreditation Canada Specialist Identify standards to be addressed Identify sites to be evaluated Balance assignments across surveyors 5 day survey period Surveyor Challenges
Surveyors come from different walks of life CEO Physician Nurse Pharmacist Lab Technician Organizations are challenged to correctly interpret standards Standards apply across different settings (community/tertiary) and jurisdictions (provincial/territorial), requiring broad language
Overlap of content between sets of standards; content is sometimes inconsistent Impact of Change in Accreditation Approach Previous survey results met ROPs January 2014 - may be unmet AND expanded scope Organizations need to rethink their strategies Shifted organizations goal from: successful survey rating safest system for patients
New High Alert ROP - ensures a targeted group of medications are safely handled from the time they enter the organization until they are administered to the patient. High-Alert Medications Medications with an increased risk of causing harm to a client if used incorrectly
Introduced to: Address unanticipated situations Impossible to meet/fulfill expectations in all practice situations Communicate potential patient safety risks to the hospital and/or organization leadership Ensure appropriate investigation and assessment Allow opportunity to identify and implement mitigating strategies Exceptions Organization Considerations
Requires development of a formal process Should be clear that exception is a last resort Interdisciplinary Committee is responsible for confirming: Situation Options to resolve Mitigating strategies
Interdisciplinary Committee needs to: Document decisions Monitor compliance Adjust strategies over time Exceptions Organizational Decisions Documentation of decisions also needs to meet the needs of: Primary surveyor
Survey team Surveyors need to understand the process and confirm that it is comprehensive and robust Exceptions Surveyor Considerations Need to know: What the exception approval process is
What the exceptions are Where they can expect to see an exception What the approved mitigating strategies are Surveyor needs to confirm that the areas they have observed comply with the details of the exception Accreditation Challenges Standards drive change but organizations are challenged
with compliance Example: to remove products - need more commercially prepared products Manufacturers are slow to support due to initial low demand Forces in-house preparation Increases likelihood that exceptions will be needed/used Accreditation Ratings
All accreditation standards are broken down into: Required Organizational Practices Mandatory Tests for Compliance Criteria Different Weight Accreditation decisions are based on performance in 3 categories: 1. ROP and Tests of Compliance 2. Instrument Thresholds 3. High Priority Criteria and all others
Accreditation Ratings 1. 2. 3. Accredited with Exemplary Standing Accredited with Commendation Accredited Key differences: Exemplary requires success on all ROP tests of compliance Percentage of met criteria (95% or more for exemplary)
Accreditation Ratings Organizations typically focus on the ROPS General and High Priority criteria are secondary Connection between criteria and ROP Multi-dose vials and LMWH
High Alert policy and secondary checks (barcoding or manual) Examples of Challenges Dialysis and Heparin Different machines across Canada Each requires different volume of heparin Some require different sizes of syringes Challenging to standardize commercial product needed
Calcium infusions Need commercially available standard doses and infusion solutions Would optimize Beyond Use Date Reduces need for on unit dilution and approved exceptions Examples of Challenges (contd) Magnesium Injection Historically, 50% most common Early adopters shifted to 20% but numbers were small Manufacturers see low yield if they switched from 50% to 20%
before the Medication Reconciliation Medication Reconciliation ROP Changes Embedded within practice standards Not within Medication Management
across sites, systems, disciplines Ongoing evolution Increasing implementation success!! Modified expectations over time reflects organizational learning Accreditation Canada ROP Handbook 2016; available from: http://www.accreditation.ca/sites/default/files/rop-handbook-2016-en.pdf Accreditation Canada ROP Handbook 2016; available from: http://www.accreditation.ca/sites/default/files/rop-handbook-2016-en.pdf
Accreditation Canada ROP Handbook 2016; available from: http://www.accreditation.ca/sites/default/files/rop-handbook-2016-en.pdf Medication Reconciliation Challenging to achieve Improves patient safety when completed comprehensively Potentially harmful when incomplete or rushed
Admission standards recently changed: Emergency Department Peri-operative Former ROP: Emergency and Perioperative Services With the involvement of the client, family, or caregiver (as appropriate), the team generates a Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) and uses it to reconcile client medications at transitions of care. New ROP: Emergency Services In partnership with clients, families, or caregivers (as
appropriate), medication reconciliation is initiated for clients with a decision to admit and a target group of clients without a decision to admit who are at risk for potential adverse drug events (organizational policy specifies when medication reconciliation is initiated for clients without a decision to admit). Emergency Tests for Compliance Medication reconciliation is initiated for all clients with a decision to admit. The medication reconciliation process may begin in the emergency department and be completed in the receiving inpatient unit.
A Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) is generated, in partnership with clients, families, or caregivers, and documented. For non-admitted clients in the target group, medication changes are communicated to the primary health care provider. Changes to Emergency Standards Need to identify eligible patients removed
In Emergency: Medication history is started Medications are not reconciled Eligible patients are admitted No reconciliation for those routine visits Communication of changes occurs Reconciliation is not performed in these environments New ROP: Perioperative Services A Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) is generated in partnership with clients, families, or caregivers (as appropriate),
and used to reconcile client medications at ambulatory care visits where the client is at risk of potential adverse drug events. Organizational policy determines which type of ambulatory care visits require medication reconciliation, and how often medication reconciliation is repeated. Group Work Concentrated Electrolytes ROP Accreditation Canada Medication Management Standards, 2016 Concentrated Electrolytes ROP
(contd) Comment in Guidelines: Accreditation Canada Medication Management Standards, 2016 Case Study # 1 A small hospital without overnight pharmacy services stocks sodium chloride 3% in an automated dispensing cabinet in the ICU that can only be accessed by an ICU nurse. Orders are reviewed the following morning and the medication is
restocked the following day. Does this practice meet the criteria for the ROP? Is an exception appropriate? Are there other strategies for safety? Case Study # 2 A hospital stocks magnesium sulfate 50% in an automated dispensing cabinet on the obstetrics unit. Nurses prepare bags of 20 grams/500 mL when required, with an independent double check.
Does this practice meet the criteria for the ROP? Is an exception appropriate? Are there other strategies for safety? Heparin ROP Case Study # 3 A hospital stocks unfractionated heparin 50,000 units/5 mL in automated dispensing cabinets in ICU and hemodialysis for locking of central lines. Does this practice meet the criteria for the ROP?
Is an exception appropriate? Are measures in place to address other criteria (e.g., MDV)? Are there other strategies for safety? Accreditation Canada ROP Handbook 2016; available from: http://www.accreditation.ca/sites/default/files/rop-handbook-2016-en.pdf Case Study # 4 Nurses are responsible for obtaining the BPMH for all patients seen in the pre-anaesthesia/pre-admission clinic. A combined BPMH/Admission order set is used. The surgeon is responsible for reviewing the BPMH and ordering medications
post-operatively. Is this considered a care transition? Does this meet the criteria for medication reconciliation? Does this process meet the ROP? What are some strategies to improve the process for obtaining the BPMH? Discussion
Challenges you are currently facing Help from others Tools and Resources Accreditation Canada
Accreditation Specialists Medication Management FAQs Available through the portal Accreditation Leading Practices Peer support CSHP Medication Safety PSN ISMP Canada
Safety Bulletins Medication Safety Self Assessment Programs Medication Reconciliation Getting Started Kits and other resources CSHP Medication Safety PSN High-Alert Medication Variance Request Evaluation of multi-dose vials of enoxaparin
Shared with permission from Grand River Hospital and St. Mary's General Hospital posted on the CSHP Medication Safety PSN October 2015 With acknowledgement to Vancouver Island Health Authority for their Accreditation Leading Practice High-Alert Medication Variance Request (contd)
ISMP Canada Resources ISMP Canada Safety Bulletins Canadian Medication Incident Reporting and Prevention System (CMIRPS) Ontario Critical Incident Learning SafeMedicationUse.ca ISMP Canada Resources (contd)
ISMP Canada Hospital Medication Safety Self Assessments for hospitals Canadian Version III (2016) Specialty assessments Oncology practice Operating Room Anticoagulant Safety
HYDROmorphone Epidural Label Checklist Revised Hospital MSSA Canadian Version III (2016) Updated from 2006 version with support from Health Canada, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care and Health Quality Ontario Includes new content from:
CMIRPS Ontario Critical Incident Learning Program ISMP (US) 2011 Hospital assessment Accreditation Canada standards reference the MSSA as a tool for overall evaluation of the medication system With thanks to Accreditation Canada, this version includes alignment with Medication Management Standards and ROPs Medication Reconciliation Tools and Resources
Safer Healthcare Now! program funded by the Canadian Patient Safety Institute (CPSI) and led by ISMP Canada See: http://www.ismp-canada.org/medrec/ and http://www.patientsafetyinstitute.ca/en/Topic/Pages/medication-reconcil iation-(med-rec).aspx Getting Started Kits Acute Care and Long Term Care revised versions available later in 2016
Home Care revised 2015 Community of Practice Post questions, share resources at http://tools.patientsafetyinstitute.ca/Pages/welcome.aspx Conclusion Accreditation is a strong driver of practice change and enhancements to patient safety
Difficult to make standards perfect; need to consider different practice environments Rationale for exceptions A variety of tools and resources are available to support organizations preparing for accreditation Contact information
Stellar Distance Stellar Parallax: = Apparent motion of a star due to Earth's annual motion = Angular size of semi- major axis of the orbit of Earth around Sun Fig. II-1: Parallax * Fig. II-2: Stellar Parallax * Units of...
The usual modus operandi for approximation algorithms for general problems: define an objective, the numerical value of which is intractable to compute develop approximation algorithm that returns approximation to that number graph achieving the approximation may be unrelated to the...
Mark It up. Underline the prepositional phrase. Put [brackets] around the preposition. Circle the preposition's object. You is an actor, which can be thought of as a type of subject for the infinitive.
Ongoing throughout the year. Final TA made and reported by end of June 2018. Judgments are made against a set of criteria. Preparation: Booster and intervention groups. Individual booster . Practice SATs. Weekly maths practise questions. ... Year 6 SATs...
Colin Fischer. by Miller, Ashley Edward and Zach StentzRealistic Fiction. ... Powerful chalk drawing magic keeps mysterious, voracious, two dimensional creatures from destroying America and cast sixteen year old Joel into a desperate battle to save his classmates.
Ready to download the document? Go ahead and hit continue!