Safety Netting - gpexcellencegm.org.uk

Safety Netting - gpexcellencegm.org.uk

Safety Netting Missed diagnosis in general practice is inevitable A process where people at low risk, but not no risk, of having cancer are actively monitored in primary care to see if the risk of cancer changes. No diagnostic test or clinical decision in general practice is 100% sensitive. individuals present at different stages in the evolution of their illness at an early stage red flag signs and symptoms may be absent or present much later when disease is too advanced

Safety netting is a 'diagnostic strategy' or 'consultation technique' to ensure timely re-appraisal Important for conditions such as suspected cancer patients present infrequently symptoms are common and non-specific Why Safety Net? Improves patient safety Supports early diagnosis of cancer outcomes Effective team work helps colleagues follow the patient journey Medico-legal protection and evidence of systems reduces risk Quality Improvement Appraisal Revalidation

CQC Why Safety Net? The number of clinical negligence claims against health professionals continues to riseone fifth of all claims brought against GP members involve cancer and by far the most frequent type of errors made by GPs in these cases related to concerns over diagnosis (81% of all errors made by GPs in cancer claims) Safety Netting The term safety-netting was introduced to general practice by Roger Neighbour Questions to ask yourself If I am right what do I expect to happen How will I know if I am wrong What would I do then? Safety Netting means different things to different people Little consensus as symptoms have varied trajectory on when to worry

What we can agree however is that proactive safety netting is necessary for early diagnosis of cancer and consistent with good practice Safety Netting Safety netting in consultation may include Advising patients when to worry Advising patients when to return for a review VERBAL and/or WRITTEN information Fixing follow-up before the patient leaves the consultation Read coding and clear documentation Safety Netting Safety netting systems may include Checking patient contact details as a continuum or opportunistically Confirmation of a suspected cancer clinic appointment, attendance and follow-up Confirmation of diagnostics appointment and attendance Hotlines for elderly or vulnerable patients who may co-morbidities that affect access Continuity of care / usual doctor or buddy systems Use of the patient healthcare software to ELECTRONICALLY safety net

Reception Three failed attempts to contact patient with abnormal chest x-ray suspicious of lung cancer telephone number on record not in use Reception teams can check contact information and address proactively GPs should confirm contact information for diagnostics and referrals Clear plan to patient how to access results (two-way communication) Patient information leaflets on why patient has been referred and document Iterates the seriousness to the patient Provide clear instructions to the patient how they access you

Face-to-face/ telephone Direct message / email Via a practice administrator or dedicated receptionist Symptoms Come back and see me if the back pain persists for another 3-4 weeks This is a classic example of safety netting in consultation No commitment from the patient or the GP For minor concerns only Always give the patient a timeline of when to be re-assessed Patient information leaflets on symptoms and when to worry Provide clear instructions to the patient how they access you

Face-to-face/ telephone Direct message / email Via a practice administrator or dedicated receptionist Diagnostics Book an appointment a week after your MRI brain to discuss the results This is another common example of safety netting for direct access diagnostics READ code Refer for MRI imaging Little commitment from GP and puts it all on to the patient Patient may not receive the appointment in a timely manner

Give the patient a timeline of when they should expect their appointment May not be appropriate for patients with co-morbidities, cognitive impairment or mental health problems Provide contact telephone numbers for patients to secure or chase their diagnostics appointment Use of practice administrator as the point-of-contact Pitfall: Unless coded it is not auditable and no method to track patient DNAs or results not received Referrals Contact the surgery if you do not get an appointment from the breast clinic in the next two weeks READ code all suspected cancer referrals DO not use EMIS codes as they are non-transferrable E-referrals and emailed referrals (no more fax)

Tracking system should be established where administrator confirms referral has been received and appointment allocated Proactive recall of patients who DNA Follow up codes or diary entries to PRO-ACTIVELY safety net and track patients in their journey Follow up Take this note and ask reception to book a blood test and follow up appointment a week later Patients are more likely to book follow up if given an appointment slip Better engagement Less likely to be lost to follow up Should document clearly in the notes Helps reception to book appointments appropriately at the right intervals Slips can be adapted to include details info for the reception team Usual doctor follow up, blood test appointment, time frames

Pitfall: Not easily auditable and no method to track patient DNAs or results not received IT software For annual PSA or repeat FBC to monitor Hb and check iron status Regular review of pathology requests Use electronic means to order pathology and imaging List reviews Call patient who have not attended for their investigations Text reminder to patients regarding primary care appointments Reduces DNA rates

Messaging service via patient access to the electronic record to patients Patient can send a message (24hour messaging system) E-consultation using WebGP IT software Use of Diary entry or follow-up codes Weekly search on patient healthcare record Generates a spreadsheet divided into usual doctor Sent to GP teams to proactively review Suspected cancer referral outcomes

Blood test and imaging (diagnostics) outcomes DNAs Patient who have not re-attended for a review of their symptoms as advised Cancer care reviews Safety Netting Codes Quality of documentation Clear Problem Titles Reviewed, evolved, grouped and combined when diagnosis is made Makes it easier to view patient journey Minimise clutter on screen Code symptoms (for use of Qcancer) Code weight, BP, smoking status Code Family history Code Fast track suspected cancer referral

Cancer specific codes Cancer diagnosis: active indefinitely Code fast track cancer referrals Code cancer treatments Single episode: Chemotherapy completed Single episode: Radiotherapy started Cancer Screening Codes Safety netting code READ CODE Did not attend bowel cancer screening 9Ni3 Bowel scope (flexi-sig) screen invitation: did not respond

68w28 BCSP faecal occult blood test abnormal 686B BCSP faecal occult blood test normal 686A Mammography normal 5372 Mammography not attended 5375

Mammography abnormal 5373 From symptoms to diagnoses: Why is it so difficult to pick up cancer? Patients symptomology Outcome Abdominal pain Could this be cancer?

Tired all the time Constipation Dry skin nausea Obesity Tingling in hands and feet Depressed Sleeping difficulties Damp in council flat

Back pain Freedom pass has expired Had to cancel holiday to Scotland and needs a letter Known Problems Diabetes poorly controlled Neuropathic chronic pain Spondylosis and disc disease Hypertension Diverticulosis Fall from a building site 10 years ago Unemployed Smoker

Side of effects of TCA Diverticulitis Poor diet Referred pain Opportunities to Safety Net

At the first consultation Ongoing reviews Direct access diagnostics Communications with secondary care Suspected cancer referrals Follow-up Locum protocols Annual leave protocols Top 10 Tips 1. Offer a timely review and action after investigations have been requested 2. Actively monitor symptoms in people at low risk (but not no risk) to see if their risk of cancer

changes 3. Where appropriate reassure people who are concerned that they may have cancer that with their current symptoms their risk of having cancer is low. 4. Explain to people who are being offered safety netting which symptoms to look out for and when they should return for re-evaluation. It may be appropriate to provide written information. 5. Ensure that results of are reviewed and acted upon promptly and appropriately; the healthcare professional who ordered the investigation taking or explicitly delegating responsibility for this. Be aware of the possibility of false-negative results for chest X-rays 6. Consider a review for people with any symptom that is associated with an increased risk of cancer, but who do not meet the criteria for referral or other investigative action. Top 10 Tips 7. The review may be planned within a time frame agreed with the person or be patient-initiated if new symptoms develop, the person continues to be concerned or their symptoms recur, persist or worsen. 8. Read code suspected cancer referrals and direct access diagnostics e.g. fast track suspected (breast) cancer referral, referral for ultrasound investigation 9. Track patient attendance and outcomes for blood tests/ imaging/ endoscopy/ suspected cancer

outpatient appointments using the relevant software, e.g. ICE software, Tquest list management or other robust electronic safety netting system(s). 10.Pro-active recall using an electronic search to review patients who do not attend their appointment for diagnostics / two week wait clinic appointment within the time frame agreed For example in EMisWeb, a coded Diary entry within the follow up component of the consultation with a specified date; a regular search can be conducted to track patients in their suspected cancer/diagnostics journey Resources REFERENCES NICE NG12, Suspected cancer: recognition and referral (2015) https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng12 NICE CG27, Referral Guideline for Suspected Cancer (2005) http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20060715141954/http://nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/cg027niceguideline.pdf RESOURCES Pan London Suspected Cancer Safety Netting Guide, Transforming Cancer Services Team, Healthy London Partnership https ://www.myhealth.london.nhs.uk/system/files/Pan%20London%20Suspected%20Cancer%20Safety%20Netting%20Guide%202016.pd

f CRUK Safety netting guide: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/sites/default/files/16._safety_netting.pdf London Cancer & Macmillan Safety Netting Guide http://www.londoncancer.org/media/126626/150708_Guide-to-coding-and-safety-netting_report_Dr-A-Bhuiya_V3.pdf

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • Ordering Adjectives - Mrs. Nash's News

    Ordering Adjectives - Mrs. Nash's News

    Ordering Adjectives. A size adjective, of course, tells you how big or small something is. For example: large, tiny, enormous, little. Ordering Adjectives. An age adjective tells you how young or old something or someone is. For example: ancient, new,...
  • Framework Project Overview for Federal CMS

    Framework Project Overview for Federal CMS

    Enterprise APD: IL-HIE Implementation APD. Progressive elaboration of Phase 1 work. HHS priority issues. Master Client Identification. State Healthcare Innovation Plan and the 1115 waiver . Enterprise Data Warehouse/Business Analytics. Enterprise Content Management. Client and Provider Portal . Alignment with...
  • Routing Techniques in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey J ...

    Routing Techniques in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey J ...

    Routing Techniques in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey J. Al-Karaki, A. E. Kamal A Survey on Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks K. Akkaya, M. Younis
  • 1.1 - Introduction to Cells - St Leonard's College

    1.1 - Introduction to Cells - St Leonard's College

    primary (1°) consumer, first-order consumer or herbivore. 3rd TL = secondary (2°) consumer, second-order consumer or carnivore. FOOD CHAINS & WEBS. Food chains represent a linear relationship between organisms. Food webs represent . interconnected .
  • PSMO-I Personnel Security Management Office for Industry (PSMO-I)

    PSMO-I Personnel Security Management Office for Industry (PSMO-I)

    Update on Current Programs. PSMO-I. PSMO-I new phone numbers. New fax number for SF312s: 571-305-6011. RRU responses - 7 March (1300 backlog) Monthly DSS/Industry WG - Quinton posts on NCMS website
  • HisTorε: Differentially Private and Robust Statistics ...

    HisTorε: Differentially Private and Robust Statistics ...

    Open Proxies (Un)availability . Median of 3,283 working proxies >92% of listed proxies are unresponsive. Median of . 41K. proxies per day. Over entire 50 day period, we observe 100K proxies, but daily median is only 40K as open proxies...
  • Algorithm Design and Analysis CSE 565

    Algorithm Design and Analysis CSE 565

    Nondeterminism. 1/19/2016. Sofya Raskhodnikova; based on slides by Nick Hopper. Nondeterministic . Finite Automaton (NFA) accepts. if there is a way to make it reach an accept . state. L3. 1/19/2016. Sofya Raskhodnikova; based on slides by Nick Hopper. Example....
  • 2015 Program Review - Hawai'i Community College

    2015 Program Review - Hawai'i Community College

    IAC: Schedule updates and program and unit annual and comp templates VCAA: CERC Process * Process Owners The graphic below depicts who is responsible for each part of the program review process—from Assessment through CERC. For more information on the...